North Carolina’s Controversial Hurricane Relief Bill Delays Building Codes

Legislators discussing the North Carolina hurricane relief bill

Article Sponsored by:

Northford Structural Connections (NSC)

Northford Structural Connections (NSC) specializes in innovative engineering solutions for enhancing the safety and durability of precast concrete structures. Their patented products, including the Double-Tee Flexible Connection (DTFC) and Double-Tee Connection Pro (DTC Pro), address critical challenges like fatigue, corrosion, and seismic resilience. With a focus on quality and longevity, NSC provides advanced connection systems trusted by industry professionals for both retrofitting and new construction projects.

News Summary

The North Carolina General Assembly has passed a hurricane relief bill allocating $500 million for recovery after Hurricane Helene, but it includes a troubling provision delaying new building codes for at least one year. This decision raises safety concerns among legislators, particularly regarding the existing outdated codes and their implications for homeowners. While supporters argue that the delay offers flexibility for recovery, critics warn it could compromise safety and increase risks in future storms. The ongoing tension between safety and affordability remains crucial as the state grapples with its recovery efforts.

North Carolina’s New Hurricane Relief Bill Raises Safety Alarms with Delayed Building Codes!

In a gripping turn of events, the North Carolina General Assembly has recently passed a significant hurricane relief bill that allocates an astounding $500 million for recovery efforts stemming from Hurricane Helene. Yet, the bill is stealing headlines not just for its monetary allocation, but for an alarming provision that postpones the implementation of crucial newly adopted building codes for a hefty duration of at least one year.

A Split in the Ranks

Debate has emerged among legislators, particularly with State Representative Pricey Harrison expressing her staunch opposition to the bill. She raises the alarm over what she terms “bad policies” creeping into hurricane relief measures. Harrison is particularly troubled by what she perceives as a persistent rollback of essential safety provisions in North Carolina’s building codes over the last 15 years, resulting in the state continuing to operate under outdated codes.

The contentious amendment to delay the new building codes was brought forth by Senator Tim Moffitt, who contends that the delay affords much-needed flexibility for communities still grappling with the aftermath of Hurricane Helene. Despite this argument, the legislative passage of Moffitt’s amendment showcased a notable divide among Democrats, as the amendment was approved by a wide margin of 34 to 11 votes in the Senate.

Building Codes Under Siege

While the current building code changes enacted by state legislators remain valid, the delayed adoption of the latest codes passed by the North Carolina Building Code Council is drawing scrutiny. The Council has yet to establish separate boards for residential and commercial concerns, a decision made last year that remains unfulfilled. Investigative reports increasingly suggest that the relaxation of building codes may heighten risks for homeowners, particularly in the wake of severe weather events.

Concerning Proposed Changes

This legislative session has seen the introduction of several bills that could significantly impact building codes and safety during construction. One proposal is under fire for allowing multi-story apartments to contain only one exit stairwell, raising significant red flags for fire safety specialists. Meanwhile, another notable figure, Rep. Mark Brody, who is also a homebuilder, downplays the potential consequences of delaying the building codes on the recovery efforts.

Financial Fallout from Outdated Codes

Approximately $70 million in federal funds from FEMA were lost due to North Carolina’s inability to modernize its building codes and implement updated national standards. Shockingly, the state is still adhering to the 2015 international building codes, with expectations for new standards to be rolled out by the year 2025. These delays have not only resulted in soaring insurance rates but have also hampered the state’s ability to access vital federal funding for disaster recovery projects.

To exacerbate matters, legislation recently passed has effectively curtailed the Building Code Council’s power to update codes, all under the guise of “preserving housing affordability.” This short-sightedness could prove detrimental in future storm scenarios. With FEMA’s BRIC grant program rewarding states that embrace modern building practices, North Carolina’s current codes place them at a substantial disadvantage, contributing to a -5 point penalty on funding applications.

Concerns from Experts and Home Builders

In the past year, North Carolina was awarded a mere $22 million from FEMA’s BRIC program, a stark decline from over $93 million in the preceding year. Critical legislation such as House Bill 488 aims to limit local inspections on essential aspects of construction like exterior sheathing, while Senate Bill 166 threatens to dilute the Council’s expertise by removing architects from its ranks. Even with veto attempts by Governor Roy Cooper, legislative overrides allowed these controversial measures to pass, raising alarms about the long-term safety impacts on homeowners.

An engineer from the Building Code Council has voiced persistent concerns regarding the neglect of pressing issues such as steep slope construction and flood resilience, essential elements in a state frequently battered by hurricanes. Yet, the North Carolina Home Builders Association maintains that the focus on regulatory reforms is necessary to enhance housing affordability and accelerate community recovery.

The Big Picture

Experts continue to warn that the ongoing weakening of building codes will create a precarious situation, worsening the impact of future storms and threatening the safety and resilience of homes across the state. Many of the structures damaged during Hurricane Helene were older builds, constructed under markedly different safety regulations. As North Carolina moves forward, the balance between safety and affordability remains a contentious battleground with significant implications for residents, lawmakers, and recovery efforts alike.