Former UNC Charlotte Employee Alleges Discrimination in New Lawsuit

Former UNC Charlotte Employee Sues for Alleged Discrimination

Charlotte, North Carolina – A former employee of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte has filed a lawsuit against the institution, claiming that she was wrongfully terminated due to discrimination after requesting accommodations for a disability and reporting instances of sexual harassment. The suit was filed in the Western District of North Carolina and outlines significant details surrounding her employment and subsequent firing.

Who is Involved?

The lawsuit is brought forth by Christine Pirotin, who served as a health and safety coordinator in the Environmental Health and Safety Department at UNC Charlotte. Pirotin, diagnosed with lupus in 2020, has faced multiple challenges due to her autoimmune disorder, which has led to various symptoms impacting her mobility, energy levels, and cognitive function.

What Happened?

Pirotin alleges that her employment was terminated on February 15 while she was out on medical leave. According to court documents, she faced resistance and a hostile environment from her supervisor, Darius Griffin, following her requests for reasonable accommodations. These included a requirement for bi-weekly vacuum cleanings of her office to reduce dust exposure and an additional day each week to work remotely.

Where did this occur?

The events taking place pertain to UNC Charlotte, a public university located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Pirotin attempted to engage university officials regarding her concerns, including reaching out to the University Ombuds Office and employee relations; however, the lawsuit claims that the university failed to implement the necessary corrective actions.

When did this happen?

The legal complaint was officially filed last week, though the incidents described took place predominantly during early 2024, leading up to her termination in mid-February. Additionally, Pirotin filed two complaints with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that were dismissed in early 2024.

Why is this lawsuit significant?

The lawsuit points to potential violations of the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Pirotin seeks compensation that includes back pay, lost benefits, attorneys’ fees, and damages for emotional, physical, and mental suffering. Her attorney, Sunny Panyanouvong-Rubeck, emphasized that the EEOC dismissals do not reflect the merits of her complaints, as the commission is often overwhelmed with cases.

Universities’ Response

A spokesperson for UNC Charlotte declined to comment on the ongoing case, citing their policy against discussing pending litigation. As Pirotin seeks justice through legal channels, the case raises important questions regarding workplace accommodations and the responsibilities of employers towards employees with disabilities.

Conclusion

This lawsuit brings to light critical issues concerning the treatment of staff in academic institutions, particularly regarding disability accommodations and workplace harassment. As the situation unfolds, stakeholders will keenly observe how this case may influence university policies and practices surrounding employee rights and workplace inclusivity.